Religious beliefs can shape personal values and behaviors, and in some contexts, certain interpretations or practices may be associated with increased risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), particularly against women. This study explores how Muslim religious leaders interpret and represent religion in the context of IPV. The research is based on qualitative data collected through focus group discussions (FGDs) with 12 Muslim religious leaders from Jakarta, Central Java, and Yogyakarta Provinces. The participants were divided into three groups, and the discussions aimed to understand their perspectives on IPV and gender roles. The findings reveal diverse interpretations of religious teachings, leading to varied attitudes toward IPV. Based on their views, the religious leaders were categorized into three typologies: conservative, pragmatic, and progressive. The conservative group upheld traditional gender norms and showed limited advocacy for female victims. The pragmatic group expressed more egalitarian views but demonstrated tolerance toward some forms of violence, indicating passive stances. In contrast, the progressive group contextualized Islamic teachings in a gender-equitable way and strongly opposed any form of IPV, actively supporting victims. The study found that most participants belonged to the conservative and pragmatic categories, suggesting that religious interpretations may reinforce IPV risk. These findings highlight the subjective nature of religious interpretations and the need for promoting progressive religious values. Strengthening such values may help reposition religion as a protective factor rather than a risk factor in cases of IPV. © 2025, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Salatiga. All rights reserved.