This study explores the potential environmental impacts of replacing natural coarse aggregates with agricultural by-products and construction waste in concrete production. The research focuses on three types of concrete: oil palm shell aggregate concrete (OPSC), natural aggregate concrete (NAC), and recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). The potential environmental impact of the concrete was assessed based on its life cycle, including abiotic depletion (fuel), global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation. In assessing these impacts, we considered the functional unit of 1 m3 and the compressive strength, CO2 uptake over a 25-year service life of the concrete, and the allocation between natural and recycled aggregate concrete production. Preliminary findings indicate that recycled aggregate concrete is the lowest potential environmental impacts among the other concretes. The results show that RAC demonstrated the lowest environmental impact, with 8.6 % lower GWP, 10.2 % lower acidification, and 11.4 % lower abiotic depletion compared to NAC. While OPSC offered reductions in cement-related impacts but had higher transport-related emissions due to long distance transportation of raw materials. © 2025 The Authors