Professional identity formation of medical students: A mixed-methods study in a hierarchical and collectivist culture
Penulis:Â Findyartini, Ardi;Â Greviana, Nadia;Â Felaza, Estivana;Â Faruqi, Muhammad;Â Zahratul Afifah, Taris
Informasi
JurnalBMC Medical Education
PenerbitBioMed Central Ltd, BMC
Volume & EdisiVol. 22,Edisi 1
Halaman -
Tahun Publikasi2022
ISSN14726920
eISSN1472-6920
Jenis SumberScopus
Sitasi
Scopus: 49
Google Scholar: 49
PubMed: 49
Abstrak
Background: Professional identity formation (PIF) has been recognized as an integral part of professional development in medical education. PIF is dynamic: it occurs longitudinally and requires immersion in the socialization process. Consequently, in the medical education context, it is vital to foster a nurturing learning environment that facilitates PIF. Aim: This study assesses PIF among medical students in various stages of study and explores their perceptions of PIF, with its contributing and inhibiting factors. Method: This mixed-methods study uses a sequential explanatory approach with undergraduate (years 2, 4, and 6) and postgraduate medical students in Indonesia. We examine the subjects by administering an adapted questionnaire on PIF. We completed a series of FGDs following questionnaire administration. Quantitative and thematic analyses were conducted sequentially. Results & Discussion: A total of 433 respondents completed the questionnaire. There were statistically significant differences among subjects on the subscales “Recognition and internalization of professional roles” and “Self-control in professional behavior”; the more senior students had higher scores. We conducted 6 FGDs in total. The results characterize PIF as a complex, dynamic, and longitudinal journey to becoming a medical doctor that is closely related to a student’s motivation. The FGDs also highlight the importance of both internal factors (students’ values, attributes, and personal circumstances) and external factors (curriculum, the learning environment, workplace-based learning, and external expectations) for PIF in medical education. Conclusion: Higher-level students show higher scores in some aspects of PIF, which further validates the potential use of the questionnaire to monitor PIF, a dynamic process influenced by internal and external factors. Generating awareness among medical students and encouraging reflection on their PIF stage may be crucial for PIF processes. © 2022, The Author(s).
Dokumen & Tautan
