Efficacy of inhaled nebulised unfractionated heparin to prevent intubation or death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: an investigator-initiated international meta-trial of randomised clinical studies
Penulis: van Haren Frank M.P., Valle Sarah J., Neto Ary Serpa, Schultz Marcus J., Laffey John G.
Informasi
JurnaleClinicalMedicine
PenerbitElsevier, Elsevier Ltd
Volume & EdisiVol. 88
Tahun Publikasi2025
ISSN25895370
eISSN2589-5370
Jenis SumberPubmed
Sitasi
Scopus: 1
Google Scholar: 1
PubMed: 6
Abstrak
Inhaled nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a strong rationale as a treatment for severe respiratory infections, including COVID-19, due to its antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anti-coagulant properties, which may prevent viral entry, lung injury progression, and pulmonary thrombosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled nebulised UFH to prevent intubation or death in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.. In this prospective, a priori set up and defined, collaborative meta-trial of six randomised clinical studies, adult hospitalised but not intubated COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to inhaled nebulised UFH on top of standard of care or standard of care alone. The dose and method of nebulisation was specific to each study. The primary outcome was intubation or death, assessed at the longest follow-up after randomisation. The meta-trial was registered at ID .. Between June 2020 and December 2022, 478 patients from 10 hospitals in six countries (Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Indonesia, Ireland and USA) were enrolled. The odds ratio (OR) for intubation or death was 0.43 (0.26–0.73, p = 0.001); the OR for in-hospital mortality was 0.26 (0.13–0.54, p < 0.001) with inhaled nebulised UFH compared to standard of care alone. There were no safety issues reported, including no instances of pulmonary or systemic bleeding in the nebulised UFH group.. In patients hospitalised but not intubated for COVID-19, inhaled nebulised UFH prevented intubation and reduced mortality, without causing pulmonary or systemic bleeding.. The Sponsor of the meta-trial was the (CRG); investigators of each contributing study were members of the INHALE-HEP CRG. No funding was received for the meta-trial. The Brazilian study was funded by The . The Irish study was funded by a Grant from to Cúram, the for Research in Medical Devices (Research Centre Award Reference: ).
Dokumen & Tautan
